Wednesday 6 February 2019

GENRE EG4 My Beautiful Laundrette (Working Title, 1991)

My Beautiful Laundrette poster
My Beautiful Laundrette is a social realist/black comedy film, and was made by Working Title before they became a subsidiary of NBCUniversal (when they were an indie company similar to Warp). The film is completely different to the kind they make now, with the plot following the (eventually) romantic relationship between Omar, a Pakistani living London and the street punk/squatter Johnny (played by Daniel Day-Lewis) as they become managers of a laundrette. (Wikipedia)


OUR INFLUENCES
  • Initially we were going to have the protagonist be in a mixed race gay relationship, but due to issues of casting we had to change this despite wanting to include non heteronormative representation to explore social issues surrounding the subject (more on this under the "other points" sub-heading)
  • The happy music that begins to play (which doesn't seem to fit with the genre) is something we want to avoid, as the example of Tyrannosaur uses incidental, acoustic music much more effectively and fitting with the genre 
  • The detailed shots of the set dressing for verisimilitude (similar to Withnail and I and Submarine)

...
PRODUCTION CONTEXT/HISTORY

PRODUCTION: Working Title, Channel 4 films DISTRIBUTION: Orion classics
BUDGET: £650k
BOX OFFICE: $2.5m
BBFC 15, MPAA R



  • the film was never intended for theatrical distribution
    • got it because of Channel 4's interest in the film
    • was screened in America
    • managed to make a (very large) profit
      BoxOfficeMojo
  • The BBFC gave this film a 15 rating - but how justified is it?
    • There is cursing throughout
    • there is a very graphic and realistic looking shot of someones skin rash
    • lots of drinking
    • In one scene a woman takes her shirt off and her nipples are censored or covered in any way through framing (there are scenes like this between Omar and Johnny where nether are wearing many clothes, but it is often the case that female nudity is more likely to be censored/sexualised)
    • The interesting point is the violence: there isn't any graphic violence, or shots of realist looking wounds, and in the climax of the film a car is destroyed followed by a brawl in the street. In the example of This is England the fight scene at the end has graphic shots of Milky's bashed up face, with lots of blood - much more extreme than My Beautiful Laundrette - but the amount of violence and swearing in both of these films is nothing compared to the mindless and graphic violence you see in many WT productions, such as Hot Fuzz (which includes someones head being speared by a model church spire, someones head being crushed by a piece of falling building, someones hand being stabbed and many more) which also was given a 15 rating.
  • 1988 Margaret Thatcher passed a law which banned the 'promotion' of homosexuality in schools and by local authorities (Local Government Act 1988, Section 28)
    • lead to a general avoidance of non-heteronormative representation and the propagation of homophobic sentiment in a lot of media
    • Thatcher's homophobic sentiment was largely emboldened by the 1980's AIDS/HIV crisis
    • this film was subsequently politically controversial 
  • Marketing strategy:
    • in the US trailer the film is portrayed mostly as a comedy in hopes of being more successful at the box office
    • there is also no reference to the homosexual content in the trailer (they refer to the relationship between the two main characters as "a partnership of 2 young entrepreneurs", and include a scene of one protagonist kissing a girl)
    • lots of neon lights were used 
      • made the film look more upbeat/comedic

  • Low-key lighting used throughout the film
    • part of social realist genre but also signifies low budget
  • Hand-held cameras
    • reflective of the British Documentary Movement
    • also signifies low budget
      • adds to realism

...
TITLES


  • The titles don't fit at all with the genre
  • The white serif font is similar to what was in other films (Withnail and I, Tyrannosaur, This is England), but the animation is very different to any of the other examples 
  • The jokey washing machine animation really doesn't much sense as it does not signify the genre, and there is only a small a comedy aspect to the film
  • All these could be a part of the hybridity aspect in hopes of making the film more marketable (similar to the misleading US trailer)

...
MISE-EN-SCENE/FIRST SHOT


  • First shot:
    • not an ELS
    • is immediately grim, no grand image
    • immediately the action begins - adds impact, reflective of the violence which pervades the film 
      • also follows Barthes action codes, very similar to in '71
    • the furniture is old, cheap looking, dirty
    • blocking the door
    • not fancy
    • walls are decaying (similar to in This is England)
    • low-key lighting 
      • first shot
      • immediately signifies poverty/social realist genre


  • Props:
    • the mattresses do not have sheets on them
    • neither do the duvets
    • multiple mugs are on the floor
    • protagonist uses a black bin bag to pack his (very few) belongings
      • all adds to verisimilitude
      • connotes poverty (makes sense as you find out they are squatting in the abandoned house)
      • 2nd shot (mattress, costume, protagonist in foreground)
        wearing a coat but no shirt
      • mugs/rubbish for verisimilitude
  • Costume:
    • character asleep on the chair is wearing a large coat to sleep warm
      • the fact that he's asleep on a chair rather than in a bed in the first place is a part of mise-en-scene
    • clothes are all worn and dirty looking
    • one man is wearing a large coat with no t-shirt underneath 
      • prioritised keeping warm
    • protagonist's jeans are ripped
      • may be purposefully to signify he is a rebel/punk
      • may be to show that he cannot afford new ones
        • could be both

...
PROTAGONIST


  • how he is anchored as the protagonist (in the opening only, the 2nd protagonist is introduced later):
    • shown in MCU high angle 2 shot in 2nd shot
      durable jacket, bleached hair, packing
      clothes in a bin bag
    • is closer to the camera 
    • is the first person you see
    • camera follows protagonist and cuts back to show his reactions
    • also uses varied focus to keep shots of him clear for longer than other characters
    • one of the first characters to speak
    • is on-screen for longer than any other character
  • costume/hair
    • the ripped jeans make him look like a rebel, but also suggest he might not be able to afford another pair
    • is wearing two pairs of trousers to keep warm (further signifying poverty)
    • oversized jacket (on top of a t-shirt and jumper) with the collar turned up
      • connotes rebelliousness/non-conformity 
      • is a durable jacket (made to last), part of a 'fashion' statement but also suggests he does not have enough money to regularly by more 'trending' clothes
      • the layers signifies poverty (is a squatter, so he can't be assured he'll have a warm place to sleep)
    • bleached hair
      • is not bleached at the roots (suggests it has been a while since he last did it/can't afford to get it done again)
      • signifies rebelliousness
      • shows he does pay attention to his appearance/artificially changes it
        • may be part of the non-heteronormative representation as it is stereotypical of gay men to pay more attention to their appearance (though there is no explicit gay content in the opening)
  • Actions/dialogue:
    • tells another man staying in the house to get up because they are being raided, and then physically hauls him off the ground
    • when leaving the house he walks in front of the other man
      • establishes the protagonist as the 'leader' of this group
    • has a northern accent
    • throwing his bag out the window 
      • does conform to stereotype that associates northern accents with poverty/lack of education (he is homeless)
      • also conforms to stereotype of northern English focus on community (wakes up his friends when police arrive rather than just leaving without them)
    • throws his clothes/belongings out of the window
      • they are not very valuable/breakable, no sentimental attachment 
    • This does change as the film goes on (character arc) as he gets a job and is given a place to live by Omar's uncle (realistic character arc/development)
      • part of the social realist genre, as the character is also forced to face up to his fascist, anti-Semitic past
      • non of this is seen in the opening though
  • These things a UK audience would be more likely to pick up on than an international audience
    • Stuart Hall's theory of readings: this reflects cultural knowledge and an element of preferred reading (similar to the banging of the bin lids in '71 as a warning for authorities), which makes sense as initially the film was never going to get an international theatrical release at all, so was made for a UK audience
...
SOUND; GENRE SIGNIFICATION


  • Though not explicitly stated anywhere, this film can be said to be a part of the emerging New Queer Cinema movement (coined in the 90's)
    • This emerged in a similar way to feminist theory in the 80's, focusing on turning societal shame into pride
    • Throughout My Beautiful Laundrette, Omar and Johnny have to repeatedly hide they relationship, and despite being rejected for it by the Tania character they continue to be together
    • The depiction of their same-sex relationship is unapologetic, and other characters are created as antagonistic/villainous (Propp's archetypes) in their disdain/disapproval
  • The happy music that begins to play with the titles does not fit at all with the genre, the scene or the rest of the film (but as stated earlier may be part of the hybrid aspect to increase audience appeal)


OTHER POINTS
  • To be clear, we did not intend to "straightwash" our initial idea, and we want to maintain the integrity of the social realist genre by exploring controversial themes in gritty, realist light, but now this will not include non-heteronormative representation (due to casting issues)
  • Although when My beautiful Laundrette "came out"... there was inherent shock value with it being not only a same-sex relationship, but also a mixed race one, a film with central queer representation would be far less radical today, though still controversial
    • a good demonstration of this is 2017's Call Me By Your Name, distributed by Sony and WB (2 of the Big Six), set in the 80's with the plot flowing the romantic relationship between a 17 year old boy and and the visiting 24 year old graduate-student assistant, Oliver. 
    • This film won 12 awards in total - a critical and financial succes
  • The other protagonist of this film (Omar, an young, enterprising anglo-pakistani) is not seen in the opening, but the casting of a '"model minority" in the lead marked a positive change in the representation of non-caucasians in film. Though the majority of representation is still caucasian and heterosexual, and this film was a low-budget indie production, it shows the importance of government funding (grants and the BFI) for more controversial films and the need for more diverse representation (also shown by the critical success of the film).
    • Although Omar is not shown in the opening, this maybe an attempt to initially make an audience more inclined to continue watching (through identification, but also the narrative enigma created in the first scene)





...

1 comment:

  1. Already a very good post, here are some things to consider:
    1: Either hyperlink source of data or just add in () hyperlinked sources eg (Wiki, BoxOfficeMojo, BBFC).
    You won't always get detail for older films, but it will help with Eval Qs if you note the basis for BBFC ratings. The MPAA don't publish reasons like BBFC (who of course didn't do this in 1985, so you may not see details for MBL, but you will for '71. Links http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/71-2014 + http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/my-beautiful-laundrette-1970-2)
    2: INDUSTRY (REPRESENTATION) you overlook the cultural shock value of a mixed race relationship [not seen in the opening], not just gay
    IDENTS Don't neglect idents - if none, clearly state so, but also then contextualise: not uncommon for older films or a few modern tentpoles, but otherwise unusual. Remember, you don't need to repeat earlier general cons work, just looking for anything genre distinctive.
    You can use the blog tag to find more on MBL; I've just added a Ppt on MBL marketing to an older post (2012) which you might get some useful points/pics from (you can just screenshot a Ppt pic to successfully save it if it doesn't from a right-click)
    You could consider some parts of the opening to reflect Barthes action codes (link to 71?)
    3: M-EN-S SHOT1 Consider why the shot is framed from inside the squat, and how this positions the audience's sympathies. Otherwise good denotation here (there can always be more, but not necessary in this context, you've provided plenty to back up the analysis).
    4: PROTAGONIST spot on; this is the kind of analysis/detail you'll need in exam Q1.
    With Eval Q4 (use of techs) in mind, it would be useful to work on ONE gif per post, + this aspect might be ideal.
    Good detail/analysis here too of the countertyping going on with his helping, not leaving, his mate; be careful in reflecting your own cultural knowledge in how you express this - that preferred reading wouldn't be open to Sam (so, use Hall here)
    5: TITLES not done yet, but think about HYBRIDITY (linking to the misleading US trailer); perhaps some comparison with Submarine on that point?
    6: POSSIBLE INFLUENCES - do include the small details in the set dressing!

    ReplyDelete

please note all comments are moderated