Showing posts with label Box Office. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Box Office. Show all posts

Friday, 5 April 2019

EVALUATION QUESTION 2 audiences and distribution

How does your product engage with audiences and how would it be distributed as a real media text?


...

What I cover in this post:
  • Different ways films can engage with audiences
  • Uses and Gratifications theory (applied to 2 case studies, Tyrannosaur and Jurassic Park)
  • Stuart Hall's theory of readings
  • Intertextuality
  • how different films achieve distribution
  • Our target audience (and how we target them)
  • different types of distribution (conglomerates vs. indies)
  • digitisation, disruption and convergence
  • Web 2.0
  • How we would distribute our film
...
Creative use of technologies:

This is my creative input, the points covered are:
  • how different films achieve distribution
  • conglomerates vs. indies
  • different types of distribution (wide release, self-distribution, film festivals, digital, theatrical)
  • how budget/funding affects distribution (government agency finding/subsidy vs conglomerates, cultural value)

For creative use of technologies I recreated an episode of the game show "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?", where I appear on a celebrity edition as the director of an upcoming indie film The Journey.

...
2A How does it engage with audiences?

...


Web 2.0
Web 2.0 describes how the internet has become driven by users, converging the line between producer and consumer. An example of this is user-generated content, like the fan-art that was made for the Cornetto Trilogy, or the poster for Hinterland which was also fan-made. This web 2.0 theoretically allow indies more of a chance at achieving successful distribution online, by setting up twitters, instagrams and being able to engage with audiences directly.
We did this through our Instagram page, and the different software/online resources which we used throughout, shown in this vodcast (also used in the evaluation question 4):



...

OUR TARGET AUDIENCE

Gender/Age
Primary target audience: males, 18-25
Secondary target audience: females, 18-25

Initially we wanted our film to be a 12+, but we did some research on the BBFC
...


...
Because nearly every indie social realist film we looked at received an 18 or 15 rating, we would hope for a 15+, but it is likely that our production would also be pushed to an 18.

To put this into some context, these are some of the rating Big Six/Subsidiaries received:


...

As the main character is male, uses and gratification theory would suggests that a primarily male target audience would be interested in this film as they would either identify with the protagonist, or aspire to be like him.

The other central character is his partner, Cathy, and she is a significant enough character to draw in a secondary female target audience.

Ethnicity
We have an ethnically diverse cast (Caucasian, Chinese, Indian), and as caucasian is the hegemonic demographic targeted, we wanted to both represent and target multiple ethnicities. This is something we found to be conventional of the social realist genre (My Beautiful Laundrette, Slumdog Millionaire), and helps to widen our target audience.

Sexuality

Initially we wanted to have non-heteronormative representation (taking influence form My Beautiful Laundrette), with the protagonist, Tanay, being with another man, but due to casting issues and a need to film we had to scrap this idea and include heteronormative representation.

...

2B How might it achieve distribution?


"Film distribution is the process of making a film available for viewing by an audience. This is normally the task of a professional film distributor, who would determine the marketing strategy for a film, the media by which a film is to be exhibited or made available for viewing, and who may set the release date."

(Wikipedia)

Some of the different types of distribution:
  • Theatrical
  • Television
  • Personal home viewing (DVDs, Video on Demand, Download e.g. iTunes)
  • Self-Distribution

...

...

The Big Six/Big Five:
Although this is debated (Disney recently sealed the deal with 20th Century Fox now owning it, but Lionsgate is sometimes included) the Big Six are all present in the top 10 distributors of 2018 list. They are the largest conglomerates of the film industry in both production and distribution.

  • Buena Vista (Walt Disney)
  • Warner Bros.
  • Universal
  • Sony/Columbia
  • 20th Century Fox
  • Paramount



top 10 distributors of 2018
Their films typically use the tentpole model (costing more then $100m), and the majority of their films are extremely commercially successful - you can see that collectively they own about 80% of the market in shares.


Wired episode with Ryan Reynolds
Marketing campaigns are often extremely expensive, and the star names which usually feature in their films are a large part of this (star billing): trailers are made for national and international audiences, cast and directors appear on chat shows, but cheaper more inventive methods are also used by conglomerates similar to indies. Youtube videos, with cast members are often a popular way of raising awareness of a star featuring in a upcoming film: for example Ryan Reynolds appeared in an episode of Wired a little before Deadpool 2 started being talked about .In the game celebrities see the web's most searched questions about them - these videos are cheap to make and don't take much time to produce/consume.
...


Indies:
Indie companies like Warp don't even make it near the top 10 lists when it comes to distribution, but there are ways they achieve distribution:

  • Arthouse cinemas
  • Direct to Itunes
  • Direct to stream
  • Straight to DVD
  • Self-distribution (e.g. through social media)
The main reason indie films often don't even get a wide release or even a theatrical release is due to budgets being too small. Even though the BFI offers out grants to many indie films for production and distribution, it is difficult to generate interest in small budget films when films like Black Panther, with extensive SFX and large action sequences, are also showing in the cinema.

Some other reasons though may be more to do with the actual content of the films: controversial topics that may include darker themes are not as commercially viable as films do not have political or controversial themes, making it difficult to generate interest in a film, drawing in only niche audiences.
Image result for this is england poster

This is England - an example
This is England takes the point of view of a young boy who joins the skinheads in the 80s. There is cussing throughout (C-word and F-bombs), and the climax involves a violent race-based assault. Although the message of this film is condemning this kind of violence, the brutality of it would be too difficult for a 4 quadrant audience to digest.


...
Digitisation, Disruption and Convergence:


  • As technology is constantly advancing, production, distribution and exhibition are becoming increasingly cheaper and more accessible to more people - expensive reels no longer have to be bought to make films, and even our production has been made digitally.

This allows films with micro-budgets to have a greater chance at distribution - Le Donk and Scor-Zay-Zee is an example of this, with a micro budget it still managed to have a theatrical trailer and then a straight to DVD release. Professional equipment used was extremely limited.

An example which took it even further is Hinterland, which had a budget of only £10k, filmed using a 15 year old camera and then released in indie cinemas with director Q+A sessions. The film was never released on DVD, but given a simultaneous release on iTunes. The film definitely achieved some successful distribution, as it made it onto a top indie films of the year list.  

As it is so easy now for anyone to make their own films relatively inexpensively and self-distribute them, the term convergence is used to reference this: the line between producer and consumer is blurring as cheaper technology becomes available.

The importance of Netflix and Amazon Prime in this disruption cannot be overlooked, as they offer films directly to audiences, without theatrical releases, and are still massively successful. This threatens theatres, as if people are able to watch Oscar winning films such as Roma at home on Netflix, there will become increasingly less need/want for people to go to cinemas.

Although this disrupts conglomerates, it can be beneficial for indies, who are able to market and sell their films completely online, like the example of Hinterland, which did have a mall theatre run, but the majority of its marketing was one online through twitter.

...
How we would distribute our film:

Self-distribution would be a good method for the distribution of our film for some of the following reasons:
  • Do not have the budget for a theatrical release
  • No star billing
  • Digitisation has made it easier for creators to use innovative methods to cheaply promote their films
  • Darker themes as possibility for a high age rating significantly lower audience interest, making it more of a niche audience film
As we have a micro-budget for our production, it is unlikely that a large distribution company would be willing to help distribute our film. Due to the accessibility of social media however, getting in touch with a film festival has been shown to be possible, which would get the film viewed by critics and journalists who could generate discussion of the film in the press. We created twitter and instagram pages to promote our film, similar to Hinterland or the Cornetto trilogy, and the example of Coz Greenhop showed how successful a method this can be in generating interest in a film.

Making deals with arthouse cinemas to do director Q+A sessions which would be mutually beneficial, accompanied by a simultaneous Video on Demand/iTunes/digital release of the film has shown to be a successful method in promoting a film and achieving distribution (Wandering Rose, and Hinterland).

...
(SAM'S WORK)
...

...

This is Sam's online job interview covering the same topic
...

Wednesday, 6 February 2019

GENRE EG5 '71 (Warp, 2015)


'71 is a 2014 British historical thriller film set in Northern Ireland. For our mock exam we analysed the opening of this film under timed conditions in a style similar to the summer exam format - I have embedded the essay (after typing it up) at the bottom of this post as it has lots of relevant points (many of which have been extracted and put in the bullet point format throughout this post).
'71 poster




PRODUCTION CONTEXT/HISTORY

PRODUCTION: Crab Apple, Warp, Film4, BFI, Screen Yorkshire, Creative Scotland

DISTRIBUTION: Studio Canal; 11 territories

BUDGET: £8.1M

BOX OFFICE: $3.2m
BBFC: 15


This production is a Warp production, but it had a much higher budget than the majority of their films. It did receive grants form the BFI and Film4 - typical of indie productions. This ensures that films with more diverse/controversial representations are still made and the industry is not monopolised by conglomerates.
This film lost a lot of money, and it was a big risk for art to have such a high budget in the first place.

The hybrid aspect of it being a historical thriller/action/social realist film did give it a higher chance at being commercially viable than the majority of Warp films, and though Studio Canal is a well-established distributor it did not put much of a gamble into the film and marketing was limited.

The film did have a week long theatrical release in America (to qualify for the Oscars), showing the ambition o this film in comparison to Warp's other productions, but the amount of territories it was related in was still a low number in compassion to WT films (and there was no distribution in China).
No. of territories (BoxOfficeMojo)
Company list (distribution) (IMDB)

The 15 rating form the BBFC is interesting, as This is England got rated an 18 mostly due to cursing and the violent scene at the end (which is relevant to the moral values the film condemns), but '71 has extremely graphic and violent scenes throughout (when his friend is shot in the face when they arrive in Belfast, when a bar is later blown up with a child inside, the homemade stitching done o the protagonist etc.). This is an examples of how more commercially acceptable films are given more chance for commercial success than more controversial ones.

Although the film was ultimately a commercial/financial flop, it was nominated for BAFTAs, BIFAs, and O'Connell won the EE Rising Star award. This shows how although the film was not a financial success, its' critical reception proved it to be a success in ways that many other Warp films are.

IDENTS/COMPANIES

  • Studio Canal
    • distribution and production company (mostly distribution)
    • Subsidiary of NBCUniversal (one of the Big Six)
    • co-production financing (that way risk is spread if the film is a flop)
    • can be part of meaning (has worked with WT and Warp)
      • shows range
  • Film4
    • tv channel (UK)
    • denotes low budget
  • BFI (British Film Institute)
    • gives grants to low budget indie films they think require subsidy (which do not need to be repaid)
    • government funded
    • previously known as UKFC (UK Film Council)
    • Screen Yorkshire is a regional branch -  the film was not shot on location, and the extensive creation of the streets with houses in varying states of destruction show where much of the budget was spent.

TITLES
  • informational words are smaller than company names
  • small serif font (white on black)
    • signifies serious drama 
  • 'presents'
    • production and distribution
  • co-production between Crab and Warp
    • the Warp logo is also on screen - larger contributor



...

MISE-EN-SCENE FOR EXPOSITION
  • blood, sweat, costume, hair
    • all wearing green military costume
    • all sweaty (including those not fighting)
    • all crew cuts (functional, military)
      • creates high level of verisimilitude
  • on the bus:
    • is not a sports car
      • signifies poverty
    • man wearing a flat cap and smoking
      • connotes Yorkshire
      • signifies film is set in the past (cannot smoke on busses now), hence the name '71
  • in the café
    • is not a fancy 5 star restaurant
      • run down, cheap looking place
      • signifies poverty
    • Is very similar to the sudden cut to the unappetising, greasy food in Withnail and I 
  • Though not in the opening, when the locals bang their metal bin lids on the ground
    • metal bins are now out of date, so signify the time period (maintain verisimilitude)
    • preferred reading: it was a warning that police/army were approaching
      • signifies target audience (older, native to the uk/Ireland)
EDITING
  • fight scene:
    • no ELS (establishing shot)
    • fast-paced editing, short takes
      • action genre
    • cuts closer to protagonists face and cuts to see his reactions
      • anchors protagonist
      • centrally framed protagonist
  • Training montage:
    • quick fade from black (ellipsis)
    • longer takes
    • hand-held camera
      • documentary style of realist genre
    • sticks to 180 degree rule
  • morning scene:
    • almost a match cut done through the audio (the sound of the gun is similar to the lights turning on)
    • fade-up from black
      • shows ellipsis
  • Café scene:
    • fast-pan to reveal brother's face
    • shot reverse shot in the conversation
    • continuity editing
    • 180 degree rule is used
    • match on action with the fork and food

...

CINEMATOGRAPHY
  • fight scene:
    • no long shots (M/MCU)
    • no fade-up
      • cuts straight to action
        • impact
        • shows brutality
    • whip-pan and hand-held tracking shots (realist)
      • Barthes action codes
    • low-key lighting
      • brutal/grim
      • natural lighting?
    • shallow field of focus
      • protagonist in focus (and foreground), but can still see detail in the background
      • anchors protagonist
    • cuts back to protagonists reaction (and centrally framed)
  • Training montage:
    • ellipsis (there is an overall ellipsis, not just here)
    • tracking shots of protagonist
    • cuts back to protagonist
      • anchorage
  • morning scene:
    • begins with tracking shot of superior officer
    • becomes MCU
    • long take
    • lighting as man steps forward (lowkey and shows shadow on half his face)
      • signified as villain?
      • establishes power dynamic
        • protagonist is in the edge of the frame
        • sets up equilibrium with protagonist having very little power within his situation
...
SOUND; GENRE SIGNIFICATION
  • Fight scene:
    • audiobridge over titles
    • sound is unclear: basketball? fighting? shouting and hitting noises
      • creates narrative enigma (Barthes)
    • audio does not fade up - cuts in
      • impact
      • brutality
    • diegetic sound
    • ambient sound (crowd shouting and hitting)
    • only coherent speech is coming form the coach
      • Northern accent (Yorkshire)
    • all for verisimilitude
  • Morning scene:
    • audiobridge fade-up
    • music is sinister
      • foreshadowing

...
CENTRAL PROTAGONIST/NARRATIVE

  • Anchorage:
    • the camera repeatedly cuts back to the protagonist to show his reactions
    • the protagonist is the first character we see in an MCU
    • As the fight scene comes to a close there is a tracking shot of the protagonist, form an MLS to an MCU of his face, showing the blood and sweat on it (verisimilitude)
  • Todorov's narrative theory:
    • the protagonist's equilibrium is established almost entirely through the editing of the opening:
      • he is established as the protagonist by repeatedly cutting back to show his reactions
      • in the training montage, there is always an establishing shot of the area, with the troops training, then it cuts to a close-up of the protagonist's face - this shows him as indiscernible from the rest of the men (a 'cog in a machine')


...
MOCK EXAM ESSAY


...

GENRE EG3 Withnail and I (Paul Heller and HandMade Films, 1987)

Poster


Withnail and I is a 1980's British black comedy/social realist cult film. Set in the 60's, very effectively, with the actor portraying the protagonist having stated "Its provenance is from a different era. None of the production values, none of the iconography, none of the style remotely has it down as an 80's picture". the plot follows two unemployed and unemployable actors, Withnail and "I" (played by Richard E. Grant and Paul McGann, respectively) who share a flat in Camden Town in 1969. Deciding to take a holiday, they visit Withnail's uncle Monty for a key to his house in the countryside, but plagued by alcoholism, drug abuse and constant rain, their 'break' is far from relaxing. (Wikipedia)

OUR INFLUENCES
  • The use of somber incidental music to set the tone and signify an older target audience (also conventional of indie)
  • Use of set dressing for character exposition (though not to show poverty or lack of up-keep)
    • shown through panning shots as music plays
  • White serif font of the titles to signify social realist
  • low-key lighting (showing both the low budget and realism)
  • Morally ambiguous characters that do not fit neatly into a single Proppian archetype (the protagonist of our story is both the hero and an antagonist/villain)

...


PRODUCTION CONTEXT/HISTORY

Budget: £1.1m
Box office: UK £600k; US $1.5m
Rotten Tomatoes: 94%
BBFC: 18

The author of the unpublished novel was paid by an oil heir, Moderick Schreiber, to turn the manuscript into a screenplay, and on its completion Paul Heller (producer) convinced Schieber to direct it after he had found funding for half of the film.
George Harrison (of The Beatles) then agreed to fund the rest of it through his company HandMade Films.
The film was nearly shut down 3 days into filming by Denis O'Brien who was overseeing the film on behalf of HandMade Films, as the film had no "discernible jokes".
In total the film cost £1.1m, although £30k was invested by the author to film scenes which the company refused to fund which he was never reimbursed for.
This film is a good example of the amount of artistic freedom indie productions have in contrast to studio films, as they have diverse and complex representations which were not so commercially viable in the 80's, and still are not today - although this film received no government funding through the BFI/UKFC, grants or TV station funding, theses are all very typical for indie productions as they exist to ensure wider representations.

  • This indie/low budget is reflected in the film
    • mostly shot on site, although none of the filming was done in Penrith, they were locations near Shap and Bampton
    • there is no CGI or SFX used
    • the image quality is often grainy, unlike how it would be for a Big Six production - this is probably because of the cheap digital transfer which is more typical of indie films, contrasting completely with studio productions of the same period such as Star Wars, with multi-million dollar upratings overseen by George Lukas
      The limited information given on BoxOfficeMojo
  • On BoxofficeMojo and The Numbers there is very little information about domestic and international gross (number of territories, US, China), though the film did get theatrical release in the UK
    • the film isn't extremely popular outside of the UK - mostly because it is too "English" and International audiences are unable to identify with many aspects of it, but also because it's success wasn't expected
    • It is also more common that indies do not have non-domestic release, though auteurs such as Ken Loach, Mike Leigh and sometimes Shane Meadows are exceptions form this as their names are more marketable
  • Daniel Day-Lewis (who was in My Beautiful Laundrette) was considered fro the role of Withnail, but it was ultimately given to an unknown actor (also reflective of indie)
  • The trailer, similar to My Beautiful Laundrette, aims to portray the film as more of a comedy than a depressing social realist (although the film is a dark comedy)

  • in 1999 the BFI voted the film as the 29th greatest British film of all time, and in 2017 Time Out magazine ranked it as 15th best ever
  • Re-issues and re-masterings have been released since the film came out, continually making money
    • Editionalising - commercial movies are often re-released in box sets, special editions, genre boxsets - even Shane Meadows has boxsets
      Withnail and I 20th anniversary 3 disc special edition on Amazon

...
TITLES

  • the simple white serif font is typical of the social realist genre, similar to '71 and Tyrannosaur
  • There aren't many extra words like "starring" "with" "introducing"
  • 3 minutes ling
  • a total of 17

...
SOUND; GENRE SIGNIFICATION
  • The film begins with slow jazz music playing
    • sets the mood - depressing, mellow - completely contrast with something you might expect to find in a horror film (e.g. the drums and high pitched strings in Bride of Chucky - this clearly reflects the genre), this is more like the incidental acoustic music of Tyrannosaur 
    • also signifies the target audience (not teen, older - also reflected in BBFC rating of 18)
  • Ambient sound of the kettle and walking is heard as the song comes to an end
  • some of the sound mixing is very poor - as actors walk towards the camera their voices become a lot louder, and are difficult to hear when far away
    • this is representative of the budget/technology available at the time
...
FIRST SHOT

  • fade form black, slow zoom, medium shot to close-up, hand-held
  • Naturalistic lighting, low-key 
    • make it look cramped, dark
    • also reflective of the low budget into context
  • Dusty dark wooden cupboard and dark brown lamp
    • connotes poverty, lack of care
  • all the dark colours make it  seem claustrophobic, oppressive, gloomy and depressing 
  • Clothing is simple, practical, dull colours
    • masculine 
    • inexpensive
    • representative of target audience (mature), more through identfication than aspiration though
  • The film title is seen in the first shot, which isn't extremely conventional of the films we've looked at, and is not distinguishable form the rest of the credits there than the slightly larger font

...
PROTAGONIST AND NARRATIVE
"I"

  • overgrown 'shaggy' hair and beard
    • unkempt 
    • lack of upkeep
    • does not need to look presentable/professional for an office job
  • Glasses and cigarette
    • make him look intellectual
    • troubled artist look
    • 'suffocating' in the apartment
    • introverted and bookish look, but also pretentious
  • When he goes to the cafe for food there are close-up shots of headlines, unappealing looking food and an ageing woman eating a greasy egg sandwich, the camera cuts to a close-up of the protagonist's eyes
    • they are slightly red with massive bags underneath them
    • he looks tired, depressed
    • The voice over is very cynical, but comedic
    • is used for exposition 
    • his criticism of mundane daily life, but also detachment from it (he "feels sorry" for people because they have to wake up to depressing headlines everyday without marking that he himself does exactly that) creates narrative enigma, but also emphasises the gritty and negative light that the film is shown through (as it is all form this character's point of view)
  • Propp:
    • The Hero"I" is signified to be the 'hero' of this film as the camera repeatedly cuts back to show his reactions, and he is the only character we are offered insight into through the voiceover
    • The Donor: Withnail's Uncle Monty is definitely the Donor of the story, giving them the key to his house in the Lake District
    • The Princess: the princess could be "I" desired career as an actor, or it could be Withnail as there are a lot of homoerotic undertones (in a scene they refer to each other as "lover", and at a bar "I" is threatened by an irishman and called a "poof" - a derogatory term)
    • The Villain: Withnail is the villain, as he is one of the obstacles blocking "I" from succeeding in his career, is more active in creating conflict (with both a local farmer, a drug dealer and a policeman), however there is also recognition of "I"s own involvement in a lot of theses situations. 
    • The Helper: it's impossible to avoid the fact that the apparent protagonist has no name in this film, and Withnail's narcissistic tendencies clearly show that he perceives himself to be the protagonist of his own life, and he views "I" as his Helper/sidekick. Although "I" is the one who proposes going on holiday
    • The Dispatcher: "I" is undoubtedly his own dispatcher, sending himself to the Lake District, but also deciding to leave Withnail to his alcohol and drug addiction to work on his own career at the end of the film
      • As there are so few characters in the film there are a lot of overlaps between the propping archetypes, which is also reflective of the realistic and complex representation of the social realist genre


...
MISE-EN-SCENE
  • the first shot is followed by a panning shot of the apartment, lots of set dressing has been done
    • wine bottles, mess, dirty clothes
    • everything looks dusty or dirty
    • the walls look grimy
    • used cups lying around
    • a British flag is hung carelessly from a chair  - shows lack of patriotism, and England isn't painted in the best light throughout the film
  • As the camera moves into the kitchen the protagonist re-enters the shot to fill up the kettle and you see the real extent of the mess
    • the sink is full to the brim, empty and full milk bottles are thrown on top of drying racks loaded with plates and a curtain over the window looks to be on its last leg
  • The curtain pattern is good for verisimilitude, as the film is set in the 60's and it is a stereotypical pattern style of the decade
  • All the furniture is clearly very fine
    • glass cabinets, wooden chairs, a grand dining table, leather sofa
    • but all clearly uncared for, maybe even second hand, all mismatching


...
OTHER POINTS

  • There were some issues that probably wouldn't have happened were the film a high budget studio production
    • the author "forced" Grant, the actor playing "I", to binge drink so he could more realistically portray the character, although in real life he was Teetotal and had a health condition which prevented him from being able to process alcohol, so he was violently sick
  • The original ending saw Withnail killing himself by pouring wine into a shot gun and firing it whilst drinking form it, but it was deemed 'too dark'
    • the film is already too grim to be considered by a conglomerate, and the low(ish) budget does mean that theres is less pressure to make a profit
    • the involvement of HandMade Films is what really prevented this
    • demonstrates the amount of freedom low-budget index have in contrast to subsidiaries/conglomerates who use the tentpole format

...