Showing posts with label titles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label titles. Show all posts

Thursday, 4 April 2019

ROUGH CUT 2



...
This is the second rough cut put together

Changes made:

  • Sound
    • the music has been changed to give it more variation, the last recording was a bit repetitive (the update post is here)
    • ambient sound of cars going past, dogs barking, and hospital background noise has been added for verisimilitude  
    • the nurse's voice has been recorded over for better sound quality
    • the music playing in the car has now been fixed so it doesn't overlap with the jogging scene and make the continuity confusing
    • audio-bridges are also being used now
  • Editing
    • Now the training scene is cross-cut with the packing scene, this speeds up the pace, which was too slow before
  • Titles
    • the titles have been completely changed, both in wording, order, position, transition effect, size, capitalisation, names, and wen they appear on screen
    • this is to make it more resemble the genre conventions we noted in other examples, particularly Withnail and I and Journeyman
    • The film title card is now also included
...

Wednesday, 3 April 2019

TECH TIPS episode 4 - FCPX Titles and transitions

Whilst editing another rough cut, I had some difficulty with adding transitions to titles in FCPX


  • adding titles to a project
  • font and size
  • blade tool (short cuts)
  • cmd + Z
  • transitions (in and out)
  • making transitions work on only titles
...

...

Wednesday, 6 February 2019

GENRE EG5 '71 (Warp, 2015)


'71 is a 2014 British historical thriller film set in Northern Ireland. For our mock exam we analysed the opening of this film under timed conditions in a style similar to the summer exam format - I have embedded the essay (after typing it up) at the bottom of this post as it has lots of relevant points (many of which have been extracted and put in the bullet point format throughout this post).
'71 poster




PRODUCTION CONTEXT/HISTORY

PRODUCTION: Crab Apple, Warp, Film4, BFI, Screen Yorkshire, Creative Scotland

DISTRIBUTION: Studio Canal; 11 territories

BUDGET: £8.1M

BOX OFFICE: $3.2m
BBFC: 15


This production is a Warp production, but it had a much higher budget than the majority of their films. It did receive grants form the BFI and Film4 - typical of indie productions. This ensures that films with more diverse/controversial representations are still made and the industry is not monopolised by conglomerates.
This film lost a lot of money, and it was a big risk for art to have such a high budget in the first place.

The hybrid aspect of it being a historical thriller/action/social realist film did give it a higher chance at being commercially viable than the majority of Warp films, and though Studio Canal is a well-established distributor it did not put much of a gamble into the film and marketing was limited.

The film did have a week long theatrical release in America (to qualify for the Oscars), showing the ambition o this film in comparison to Warp's other productions, but the amount of territories it was related in was still a low number in compassion to WT films (and there was no distribution in China).
No. of territories (BoxOfficeMojo)
Company list (distribution) (IMDB)

The 15 rating form the BBFC is interesting, as This is England got rated an 18 mostly due to cursing and the violent scene at the end (which is relevant to the moral values the film condemns), but '71 has extremely graphic and violent scenes throughout (when his friend is shot in the face when they arrive in Belfast, when a bar is later blown up with a child inside, the homemade stitching done o the protagonist etc.). This is an examples of how more commercially acceptable films are given more chance for commercial success than more controversial ones.

Although the film was ultimately a commercial/financial flop, it was nominated for BAFTAs, BIFAs, and O'Connell won the EE Rising Star award. This shows how although the film was not a financial success, its' critical reception proved it to be a success in ways that many other Warp films are.

IDENTS/COMPANIES

  • Studio Canal
    • distribution and production company (mostly distribution)
    • Subsidiary of NBCUniversal (one of the Big Six)
    • co-production financing (that way risk is spread if the film is a flop)
    • can be part of meaning (has worked with WT and Warp)
      • shows range
  • Film4
    • tv channel (UK)
    • denotes low budget
  • BFI (British Film Institute)
    • gives grants to low budget indie films they think require subsidy (which do not need to be repaid)
    • government funded
    • previously known as UKFC (UK Film Council)
    • Screen Yorkshire is a regional branch -  the film was not shot on location, and the extensive creation of the streets with houses in varying states of destruction show where much of the budget was spent.

TITLES
  • informational words are smaller than company names
  • small serif font (white on black)
    • signifies serious drama 
  • 'presents'
    • production and distribution
  • co-production between Crab and Warp
    • the Warp logo is also on screen - larger contributor



...

MISE-EN-SCENE FOR EXPOSITION
  • blood, sweat, costume, hair
    • all wearing green military costume
    • all sweaty (including those not fighting)
    • all crew cuts (functional, military)
      • creates high level of verisimilitude
  • on the bus:
    • is not a sports car
      • signifies poverty
    • man wearing a flat cap and smoking
      • connotes Yorkshire
      • signifies film is set in the past (cannot smoke on busses now), hence the name '71
  • in the café
    • is not a fancy 5 star restaurant
      • run down, cheap looking place
      • signifies poverty
    • Is very similar to the sudden cut to the unappetising, greasy food in Withnail and I 
  • Though not in the opening, when the locals bang their metal bin lids on the ground
    • metal bins are now out of date, so signify the time period (maintain verisimilitude)
    • preferred reading: it was a warning that police/army were approaching
      • signifies target audience (older, native to the uk/Ireland)
EDITING
  • fight scene:
    • no ELS (establishing shot)
    • fast-paced editing, short takes
      • action genre
    • cuts closer to protagonists face and cuts to see his reactions
      • anchors protagonist
      • centrally framed protagonist
  • Training montage:
    • quick fade from black (ellipsis)
    • longer takes
    • hand-held camera
      • documentary style of realist genre
    • sticks to 180 degree rule
  • morning scene:
    • almost a match cut done through the audio (the sound of the gun is similar to the lights turning on)
    • fade-up from black
      • shows ellipsis
  • Café scene:
    • fast-pan to reveal brother's face
    • shot reverse shot in the conversation
    • continuity editing
    • 180 degree rule is used
    • match on action with the fork and food

...

CINEMATOGRAPHY
  • fight scene:
    • no long shots (M/MCU)
    • no fade-up
      • cuts straight to action
        • impact
        • shows brutality
    • whip-pan and hand-held tracking shots (realist)
      • Barthes action codes
    • low-key lighting
      • brutal/grim
      • natural lighting?
    • shallow field of focus
      • protagonist in focus (and foreground), but can still see detail in the background
      • anchors protagonist
    • cuts back to protagonists reaction (and centrally framed)
  • Training montage:
    • ellipsis (there is an overall ellipsis, not just here)
    • tracking shots of protagonist
    • cuts back to protagonist
      • anchorage
  • morning scene:
    • begins with tracking shot of superior officer
    • becomes MCU
    • long take
    • lighting as man steps forward (lowkey and shows shadow on half his face)
      • signified as villain?
      • establishes power dynamic
        • protagonist is in the edge of the frame
        • sets up equilibrium with protagonist having very little power within his situation
...
SOUND; GENRE SIGNIFICATION
  • Fight scene:
    • audiobridge over titles
    • sound is unclear: basketball? fighting? shouting and hitting noises
      • creates narrative enigma (Barthes)
    • audio does not fade up - cuts in
      • impact
      • brutality
    • diegetic sound
    • ambient sound (crowd shouting and hitting)
    • only coherent speech is coming form the coach
      • Northern accent (Yorkshire)
    • all for verisimilitude
  • Morning scene:
    • audiobridge fade-up
    • music is sinister
      • foreshadowing

...
CENTRAL PROTAGONIST/NARRATIVE

  • Anchorage:
    • the camera repeatedly cuts back to the protagonist to show his reactions
    • the protagonist is the first character we see in an MCU
    • As the fight scene comes to a close there is a tracking shot of the protagonist, form an MLS to an MCU of his face, showing the blood and sweat on it (verisimilitude)
  • Todorov's narrative theory:
    • the protagonist's equilibrium is established almost entirely through the editing of the opening:
      • he is established as the protagonist by repeatedly cutting back to show his reactions
      • in the training montage, there is always an establishing shot of the area, with the troops training, then it cuts to a close-up of the protagonist's face - this shows him as indiscernible from the rest of the men (a 'cog in a machine')


...
MOCK EXAM ESSAY


...

Monday, 4 February 2019

CONTRASTING STUDY: Grimsby (Working Title, 2016)

Grimsby poster
This is NOT a social realist film! We are, however, using this comedy (spy/action satire) to help us clarify the characteristics of social realist films: we'll contrast the media language of this with what we've observed is conventional for the social realist genre...

PRODUCTION: Working Title, Big Talk, Village Roadshow [US partner] +2 others
DISTRIBUTION: Sony (UK), Colombia (UK); [no China] 36 territories
BUDGET: $35m
BOX OFFICE: UK $7.5m, US $7m; World $25m
BBFC 15, MPAA R (quite high)


SOME CONTEXT: An example of the impact of the changed, reduced status of WT within its parent big six conglomerate, NBC-Universal. WT had been receiving $600m funding every 7 years, with clearance to greenlight any project up to a $25m budget - but that has been reduced to a 'first look' deal, meaning Universal can decide whether they want to 'pick up' a WT project or not. In this case they didn't, Sony (and its subsidiary Colombia) did ... and maybe Universal were wise, as it failed to even recoup its budget, never mind the 2-3 times budget generally accepted as needed to move into profit.

The Gant rule obviously doesn't apply: its a very British film - so much so that the title had to be changed for US and international markets as the place name Grimsby has no recognition and is essentially meaningless and confusing outside the UK (unlike London). 


...
IDENTS
  • Sony ident is the first
    • Big Six production
    • Very unlikely to see a Big Six name on a social realist film
  • Columbia
    • subsidiary of Sony
  • Village Roadshow Pictures
    • US production partner
    • virtually unheard of for UK social realist flick (unlike for comedy
  • WT did not get an ident
...
SOUND
  • Begins with famous song (R Kelly)
    • small indie companies do not have the budget to get copyright licenses 
    • non diegetic well-known commercial track as an audiobridge over idents to main scene
    • social realist films do not usually start with music (often have incidental music)
      • lyrical music is also uncommon for social realist
      • e.g. Tyrannosaur, but This is England has some
    • OST features Ed Sheeran!

...
FIRST SHOTS
  • Not ELS establishing shot
    MCU -back tattoo, sweat, beer can, football shirt
    • unusual choice of MCU
  • no fade-in (black screen before shot after ident 4)
  • Close-up of huge back tattoo ('ENGLAND' and 3 lions) 
    • football tattoo
    • sweat
    • beer cans visible in background 
  • Master shot
    • reveals scene to be a bed shop
    • Tightly framed shots for the opening sex scene are made comic by use of a master shot revealing the location
    • poverty is being signified by massive sale posters hanging all over the shop ('lowest prices in Grimsby')
    • very low prices $89.99 for a double bed
master shot - low prices, sale

...

REPRESENTATION
  • Stereotyping begins immediately
    MCU (cropped) - facial hair, scruffy look
    • overgrown hair and facial hair
    • sideburns
    • ridiculous tattoo
    • football top
    • beer can
    • and then reveal of moronic antisocial behaviour
  • Comparison to social realist:
    • The realism of social realist films can lead to showing antisocial behaviour
      • e.g. Tyrannosaur protagonist is violent, racist and unemployed
      • e.g. This is England swearing throughout, violence, underage drinking etc. 
  • Immediate heteronormativity 
    • opening sex scene
    • idea of male provider (the male protagonist is the one to say "we'll take [the bed]")
      • though this also signifies that he is the protagonist as it cuts back to his face/reactions

...
Is very short for an opening scene - contrast with This is England and Tyrannosaur etc.
just 30 seconds into the opening sequence which is then followed by another famous commercial song (Blur)

...
TITLES
titles
  • Serif font
    • shot 1 is typical of a social realist though
    • grim street red brick terraced houses, heavily graffitied
    • many houses are loaded up
  • Mise-en-scene
    • contrast to This is England - Shaun leaves his bike outside showing the community of the working class neighbourhood as he trusts it won't get stolen
    • Grimsby only shows the decay (harsh 2 dimensional stereotype of working class)

...

Tuesday, 8 January 2019

AUDIENCE RESEARCH: titles/fonts


SAM'S WORK:
...

...

...

...

After getting some audience feedback, they all agreed that the first font fits best for our social realist film. The sharp edges (serif-font) connotes seriousness. The second one fits better for a horror/slasher movie and the third one it too childish.

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

GENRE EG1: Tyrannosaur

(SAM'S WORK) - input by me in green
...

...

Budget: £750k
Box Office: $299k (Worldwide) / $22k (US)
Ratings: 84% (RottenTomatoes) / 7.6/10 (IMDb) / 3.5/4 (Roger Ebert)
Production Companies: Film4, UK Film Council, Screen Yorkshire, EM Media, Warp X, Inflammable Films
Director: Paddy Considine

IDENTS:

No Idents.

TITLES:

  • serif font
  • white font on black background connotes seriousness and drama
  • different sizing between the titles and names to distinguish the different roles 
  • the main title is centered and all capitals
  • animated titles, fade in and out
  • different positioning of titles
    • for aesthetic purposes
  • duration of title sequence: 00:00:03 - 00:02:04
  • numbers of titles: 12
  • In the other Paddy Considine film we looked at (Journeyman) there were also no titles before names (other examples had "with" "starring" "introducing" etc.)

...

SOUND:
  • soft guitar sound with notes that are a few seconds apart has an impact on our mood
  • it connotes drama / seriousness
  • get the serious feel
  • makes us calm
  • ambients sound of radio to add verisimilitude
  • the incidental acoustic music is very conventional of social realist films
  • it kicks in just after he has kicked his dog - this encourages the audience to empathise with the protagonist, rather than see him as a villain
1st SHOT:
  • establishing shot
  • starts with a close up of a male character
  • narrative enigma because it's not very clear how the male character looks like due to shadows 
  • using natural lights
  • lowkey lighting
...

...

CENTRAL PROTAGONIST + NARRATIVE:
  • the male character is in every shot
  • tracking shot when he is walking back home while having his dog in his arms
  • shot variety of him
  • he is always in focus
  • it cuts back to him
  • anchors he is going to be the central protagonist
  • he is coming from the working class ( track pants, white and dirty shirt, drunk, is desperate for money)
  • The music allows the audience to empathise with him, rather than see him as the villain who just kicked his dog to death in a drunken rampage
  • This is quite a controversial and dark theme, something more commonly found in social realists
    • the protagonist is an anti-hero: complex an din shades of grey, not a 2 dimensional stereotype
    • this is similar to what was found in the New Wave movements
MISE-EN-SCENE FOR EXPOSITION:
  •  small room 
  •  squeaky floor
  • bland colours
  • anchors poverty
  • The beer cans are used to confirm that he is drunk
...

...

TRANSITION TO MAIN FILM:
  • The equilibrium is disrupted when the central protagonist kills his dog
  • Todorov's 5 point narrative theory:
    • establish equilibrium
      • the protagonist is a violent, alcohol drinking, swearing unemployed man
    • disrupt equilibrium
      • when accidentally injures his dog and realises he has to kill it so that it won't be in pain anymore, he later has a breakdown, and realises he must change something in his life, but has little power to change much
    • the rest of the theory is not seen in the opening, but is present throughout the film

Fail or Success?

From the ratings I can tell that the movie was quite a success. Paddy Considine even got an award for the best film and best debut director award. Olivia Colman who plays Hannah in the movie got an award for the best actress.
...

...


However, the movie didn't do well in Box Office. One reason is because it only got a limited screening in America in just 5 theatre. Also, Warp managed to get Tyrannosaur quite widely distributed on DVD and not so much in cinema which the Box Office doesn't count the sales of DVD's.
...

...

It only grossed £299k (only the Box Office worldwide), whereas, the budget is £750k. The movie received a positive reviews and currently has a score of 83% on RottenTomatoes. Stuart McGurk of GQ magazine even called Tyrannosaur  "The best British film of the year". This is very rare for Indie movies to win awards and get good reviews from companies such as GQ or RottenTomatoes. This also indicates that the movie was a success. But still in the UK the movie doesn't sell well due to it's genre "a brutal, frank, and ultimately rewarding story of violent men seeking far-off redemption". 




For our film opening I took influence of the background music. It's a guitar with notes that are several seconds apart. For the font I like the serif font, it connotes seriousness. However, I am definitely including the white font on black background that anchors seriousness and drama. 

Saturday, 13 October 2018

GENERAL CONVENTIONS 2: Titles research

RESEARCH (SAM'S)
WHAT I DISCUSS IN THIS POST:
- initial research: what are the numbers?
- precise wording and order
    - companies
    - auteur
    - actors
    - technical roles
- design: font size, animation, case/s, (sans-)serif, colouring; connoting genre
- timing, animation, transitions (how long stay on screen; varies by role? straight cuts or transitions?
- main title: any difference or same design as other titles? duration different?


MAIN FINDINGS:
...

...
  • a method where film credit production companies
  • about 20 - 30 titles 
  • there can be exception, in the Mexican or The Wicked Man there we only see under 10 titles
  • at high end tentpole movies everything is pushed to the back so the titles start after the movie
  • usually about 3 mins long 
  • in title sequence you find a lot of signifiers
  • exposition what the genre of the movie is going about
  • different positioning
  • different size font for titles


We started this process by individually researching a wide range of titles sequences, and analysing the basic numbers and trends behind these.

1: INITIAL RESEARCH - WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS??

SUMMARY:
How many titles do we usually see?

I looked at 10 film openings from different genres which are linked in this post
In film openings, we usually see between 25 - 30 titles

CONVENTIONAL EXAMPLES:
- Sleepers (1996)
- The Notebook (2004)
- Mean Girl (2004)
- Sherlock Holmes A Game Of Shadows (2011)
- Lord of War (2005)
- Spider-Man 3 (2007)


EXCEPTIONS:
However, there can be exceptions sometimes we only see a few titles (under 10). E.g. The Mexican (2001) or The Wicker Man (1973)

In some modern tentpole movies, you find no titles at the beginning, everything is pushed to the end e.g. Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows. The first title to appear starts at 01:55:32 (ending 01:57:37).
Only 3 Titles
7 Titles
Titles are 5mins long!
How long is the title sequence?
The duration from the first to the last title is usually about 3 minutes long. 
In some cases, it can be considerably more or less, eg:

  • The Mexican (2001) the duration of the title sequence is only 23 seconds
  • Mean Girls (2004) the title sequence is almost 5 minutes long. 






Austin Powers International Man Of Mystery (1997)
  • Budget: $18M
  • Box Office: $54M (US) / $14M (Foreign) / $68M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Jay Roach
  • Ratings: 70% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 7/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Capella International, Eric's Boy, Juno Pix, KC Medien, Moving Pictures, New Line Cinema
  • Numbers of titles: 14
  • Duration from first to the last title: 01:40 - 03:35

Sleepers (1996)
  • Budget: $44M
  • Box Office: $53M (US) / $112M (Foreign) / $166M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Barry Levinson
  • Ratings: 73% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 7.5 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Astoria Films, Baltimore Pictures, Polygram Filmed Entertainment, Propaganda Films, Warner Bros.
  • Numbers of titles: 31
  • Duration from first to the last title: 00:12 - 02:42


The Notebook (2004)
  • Budget: $29M
  • Box Office: $81M (US) / $2M (UK) / $115M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Nick Cassavetes
  • Ratings: 52% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 7.9/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: New Line Cinema, Gran Via, Avery Pix
  • Numbers of titles: 29
  • Duration from first to the last title: 00:16 - 03:04


Apocalypse Now (1979)
  • Budget: N/A
  • Box Office: $79M (US)
  • Director: Francis Ford Coppola
  • Ratings: 96% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 8.5/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Zoetrope Studios
  • No Titles


The Wicker Man (1973)
  • Budget: N/A
  • Box Office: $61K (US) 
  • Director: Robin Hardy
  • Ratings: 90% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 7.6/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: British Lion Film Corporation
  • Numbers of titles: 7
  • Duration from first to the last title: 00:33 - 01:47


The Mexican (2001)
  • Budget: $57M
  • Box Office: $67M (US) / $5M (UK) / $148M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Gore Verbinski
  • Ratings: 55% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 6.1/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Dream Works, Newmarket Capital Group, Lawrence Bender Productions, Pistolero Productions LLC
  • Numbers of titles: 3
  • Duration from first to the last title: 00:32 - 00:52


Mean Girls (2004)
  • Budget: $17M
  • Box Office: $86M (US) / $10M (UK) / $129M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Mark Waters
  • Ratings: 83% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 7/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Paramount Pictures, M.G. Films, Broadway Video
  • Numbers of titles: 00:21 - 04:58
  • Duration from first to the last title: 28


Sherlock Holmes A Game Of Shadows (2011)
  • Budget: N/A
  • Box Office: $187M (US) / $42M (UK) / $545M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Guy Ritchie
  • Ratings: 59% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 7.5 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Warner Bros., Village Roadshow Pictures, Silver Pictures, Wigram Productions, Lin Pictures
  • Numbers of titles: 29
  • Duration from first to the last title: 01:55:32 - 01:57:37


Lord of war (2005)
  • Budget: $50M
  • Box Office: $24M (US) / $4M (UK) / $73M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Andrew Niccol
  • Ratings: 61% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 7.6/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Entertainment Manufacturing Company, VIP 3 Medienfonds, Ascendant Pictures, Saturn Films, Rising Star, Copag V, Endgame Entertainment, Majority Entertainment
  • Numbers of titles: 26
  • Duration from first to the last title: 00:35 - 04:28


Spider-man 3 (2007)
  • Budget: $258M
  • Box Office: $337M (US) / $67M (UK) / $890M (Worldwide)
  • Director: Sam Raimi
  • Ratings: 63% (Rotten Tomatoes) / 6.2/10 (IMDb)
  • Production Companies: Columbia Pictures Corporation, Marvel Studios, Laura Ziskin Productions
  • Numbers of titles: 30
  • Duration from first to the last title: 00:39 - 03:05

2: Precise wording and order

SUMMARY:

A title is a method where films credit production companies or Cast by visuals and sound (Stars, Editor, Director.....).

The opening credits for production companies are the most important members of the production which are often accompanying by non-diegetic music. The aim of an opening sequence is to establish the mise-en-scene.

Titles (Numbers):
- About 20-30 titles (However sometimes only the companies and the director is mentioned)
- The duration of titles is usually about 5 minutes long. (It can be shorter and a gap between them)
- +/- 5 companies are usually credited (But it can be less)

Main areas and order:
1. A ... production/presents/in association with

2. Film (Director)
3. Starring... / With... / Introducing... / Co-starring... (Actors)
4. Technical Roles (about 10):
          - Casting by...
          - Costume designed by...
          - Music composed by...
          - Editor...
          - Director of photography...
          - Lightning by...
          - Production designer...
          - Screenplay by...
          - Executive Producer... / Produced by...
          - Directed by...
5. Directed by... (Director)
(Director is the only one who always gets credited twice)



Spider-Man 3 (Sam Raimi), 2007
...

...

...


...


The wording of the titles:
  1.  ... Presents
  2.  A ... / ... Production
  3.  " Working Title "
  4.  " Actors name "
  5.  " Actors name "
  6.  " Actors name "
  7.  " Actors name "
  8.  " Actors name "
  9.  " Actors name "
  10.  " Actors name "
  11.  " Actors name "
  12.  " Actors name "
  13.  " Actors name "
  14.  " Actors name "
  15.  " Actors name "
  16.  Casting by ...
  17.  Effects Supervisor ...
  18.  Original Music Themes by ...
  19.  Score by ...
  20.  Costume Designer ...
  21.  Film Editor ...
  22.  Production Designer ... and ...
  23.  Director of Photography ...
  24.  Executive Producers ...
  25.  Executive Producers ...
  26.  Produced by ...
  27.  Based on the Marvel Comic Book by ... and ...
  28.  Screen Story ... & ...
  29.  Screenplay by ...  & ... and ...
  30.  Directed by ... 


Sleepers (Barry Levinson), 1996
...

...

...


...


The wording of the titles:
  1.  ... Presents
  2.  A ... Production
  3.  A ...  Film
  4.  " Actors name "
  5.  " Actors name "
  6.  " Actors name "
  7.  " Actors name "
  8.  " Actors name "
  9.  " Actors name "
  10.  " Working Title "
  11.  " Actors name "
  12.  " Actors name "
  13.  " Actors name "
  14.  " Actors name "
  15.  " Actors name "
  16.  " Actors name "
  17.  " Actors name "
  18.  and " Actors name "
  19.  Casting by ...
  20.  Co-Producer ...
  21.  Music by ...
  22.  Costume Designer ...
  23.  Music by ...
  24.  Costume Designer ...
  25.  Editor ...
  26.  Based upon the book by ...
  27.  Executive Producer
  28.  Produced by ... and ...
  29.  Written for the Screenplay and Directed by ... 



Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (Guy Ritchie), 2011
...

...

...


...


The wording of the titles:
  1.  Directed by ...
  2.  Written by ... & ...
  3.  Produced by ...
  4.  ... were credited by ...
  5.  Executive Producer ...
  6.  Co-Producers ...
  7.  Director of Photography ... 
  8.  Production Designer ...
  9.  Editor ...
  10.  " Actors name "
  11.  " Actors name "
  12.  " Working Title "
  13.  " Actors name "
  14.  " Actors name "
  15.  " Actors name "
  16.  " Actors name "
  17.  " Actors name "
  18.  and " Actors name "
  19.  Casting by ...
  20.  Music by ...
  21.  Music Produced by ... and ... 
  22.  Costume Designer ...
  23.  Visual Effects Supervisor ...
  24.  A ... Production
  25.  A ... Production
  26.  A ... Production
  27.  A ... Film 


...
RESEARCH (mine):
looking at 10 films (link to post here) from a range of genres I counted the number of titles in their opening sequences and the duration


  • there were usually 20-30 titles
    • in some films only the director/companies had titles
  • In older examples there were usually more titles on screen at once (4+) an in newer examples there were never more than 3
Submarine 

Start/end time of main titles: 0:00-1:53

  • Submarine was co-produced
    •  2 indie companies (uk- Warp, usa- Red Hour)
    • Film4 Productions - a subsidiary of Channel Four Television Corporation
    • UK Film Council (in this case funded by the National Lottery)
  • Film4 and the UK Film Council both have idents, and are credited in the titles
  • 8 companies in total were credited
The full titles were all upper case, and are given below in order
(prod/dist company x2) present
in association with (prod comapny x2)
in association with (prod comapny x2)
in association with (prod company)
a (prod company) production
film title
...

I was surprised at how few there were for Submarine when you compare these opening credits to how many people were involved on the IMDB credits, and the director/writer wasn't credited either.

The sans serif font used is against a dark blue background - the seriousness of the font signifies social realism and coming of age - which this film has aspects of. However the extreme spacing of the lettering connotes a slightly quirky aspect - the film is a hybridised rom-com.
In this example the font may also have been chosen as a part of the IP - it is the same font used on the cover of the book which the film is based on.
The blue also links with the ocean theme and setting, so could be a combination of mise-en-scene and for aesthetic purposes.
...
Baby Driver


Start/end time of main titles: 5:43-8:20
Running time of main titles: 2:33


  • Baby Driver was co-produced
    • America indie company Media Rights Capital
    • uk subsidiary company Big Talk Productions (subsidiary of ITV)
    • uk subsidiary Working Title (a subsidiary of NBCUniversal - one of the Big Six largest conglomerates)
The full titles were all upper case, and are given below in order
(dist. company x2) present
a (production company x2) production
a film by (director & writer)
film title
(actor's name)
(actor's name)
(actor's name)
(actor's name)
with (actor's name)
and (actor's name)
(actor's name)
(actor's name) x3
casting by
choreography by
costume designer
music by
editors
production designer
director of photography
executive producers (x3 names)
executive producers (x3 names)
produced by (x3 names)
written and directed by

There were a lot more credits given in this one compared to the indie film Submarine - this is probably because star billing is a large marketing/advertisement strategy. Actors agents often put a lot of effort into getting their actors names into billing blocks and having title cards to themselves rather than being one name amongst several. This is more typical of high-budget films made by conglomerates or subsidiaries.

There was an animation with these credits
via GIPHY
The title for the film made the building look like a road and the orange of the font emphasised this (the colour of taxis and road lines). This has narrative connotations as the protagonist is a getaway driver.
The serif font is also an intertextual reference: the font is called Gunplay and was designed for the 1972 Steve Mcqueen/Ali McGraw film The Getaway (a neo-noir film) - This appeals to a secondary older target audience who would be able to pick up on the preferred reading 

...
Mean Girls



Start/end time of main titles: 0:00-5:12


  • Mean Girls was produce by Broadway Video, a production company founded by Lorne Michaels, who receives 2 credits
    • again famous actors get there own credits (Lindsey Lohan directly after the procurers name and before the film title)
    • it was distributed by Paramount - one of the Big Six conglomerates

The full titles were all upper case, and are given below in order
a (producer) production
(actor's name)
film title
(actor's name)
(actor's name)
(actor's name)
(actor's name)
(actor's name)
(actor's name) x2
(actor's name) x3
and (actor's name)
casting by...
based on the book ... by...
music supervisors (names x2)
music composed and conducted by ...
co-producer...
costume designer...
editor...
production designer...
director of photography...
executive producer...
produced by ...

screenplay by...
directed by ...

The font clearly indicates a female teen target audience and signifies rom-com/drama: the serif fun tis almost bubble and lots of pink is used. There is animation with these titles: they slide in and bounce - this signifies the comedy aspect.

...